Poor graphics in Hyper quality

coth

So it's still like it was in beta. Low-res textures and very poor viewing distance. Most buildings in distance appears as boxes fill with solid color.

OdanUrr

Have you tried uncapping the memory restriction?

ShadowstarXIII

Restart your game, also sometimes the game can take a sec or 2 to render in things

coth

turning off restriction seem to help, but i'm getting 16-22 fps on GTX 970 then and stuttering every few secconds.

coth

-

Mildocjr

Anyone tested hyper with a Titan X or 980 Ti? I have a 980 Ti Sea Hawk and I'm curious how it runs before I get home and find out for myself.

Mildocjr

OdanUrr wrote: »

Have you tried uncapping the memory restriction?

Is this an in game setting or a launch argument? If it's a launch argument what is that argument?

Found the answer was in the game settings, haven't tried adjusting my settings since beta.

coth

I'm on GTX 970. Hyper textures makes it 15-20 fps on street with micro stuttering. Switched to ultra textures, microstuttering gone, fps went a bit up. Probably lack of VRAM, so GTX 980+ wouldn't have problems.

Switching most to ultra fps rises to playable 48-55.

hyper quality
https://yadi.sk/i/qM9OubE-sLBFj

ultra quality
https://yadi.sk/i/PHGtX5khsLBHR

Mildocjr

coth wrote: »

I'm on GTX 970. Hyper textures makes it 15-20 fps on street with micro stuttering. Switched to ultra textures, microstuttering gone, fps went a bit up. Probably lack of VRAM, so GTX 980+ wouldn't have problems.

Switching most to ultra fps rises to playable 48-55.

hyper quality
https://yadi.sk/i/qM9OubE-sLBFj

ultra quality
https://yadi.sk/i/PHGtX5khsLBHR

Lol I went through those and felt like I was playing a spot the differences puzzle. Seems there is more traffic and buildings seem to extend their detail a bit. Shading and water is better looking.

Morgos47

Mildocjr wrote: »

Anyone tested hyper with a Titan X or 980 Ti? I have a 980 Ti Sea Hawk and I'm curious how it runs before I get home and find out for myself.

I get around 70-100 fps on 980 TI on Ultra running in 1080

coth

Playing further with quality. It seems main drop comes from lighting. Over 2x fps difference between ultra and hyper. Textures brings a bit drop. But even with most ultra and hyper textures on 50-60 fps it still micro stutters. So hyper textures are unplayable on GTX 970.

Mildocjr

coth wrote: »

Playing further with quality. It seems main drop comes from lighting. Over 2x fps difference between ultra and hyper. Textures brings a bit drop. But even with most ultra and hyper textures on 50-60 fps it still micro stutters. So hyper textures are unplayable on GTX 970.

Challenge Accepted. If it doesn't work out, looks like I'm going to be waiting a while to play ME:C on Hyper graphics.

Teto

For best textures it's written somewhere that you need at least 4Go of memory....

Mildocjr

Well the card I've got is a 6 GB card, it barely competes with a Titan X, maybe 1 or 2 FPS in difference.

coth

some more comparison.

2x resolution scale (basically renders 4k/2160p and draws scaled to 2k/1080p). This makes picture drastically better and sharper. But it also requires some SLI configurations. Hyper textures and hyper/HBAO lighting. Getting 8 fps in average on GTX 970. You can actually see hyper textures aren't that hyper. Still blured a bit.
https://yadi.sk/i/2n4bjoTrsLEYN

Hyper/hyper/HBAO on 1x scale. There is 4 fps, as screenshot taken during stuttering. On average 15-22 fps.
https://yadi.sk/i/qyikDdy2sLEiG

Ultra/ultra/HBAO. 29-38 fps in average.
https://yadi.sk/i/prNO_HUKsLEin

Ultra/ultra/SSAO. 52-62 fps on open air in average.
https://yadi.sk/i/hPr6tk5bsLEnQ

Hyper textures and Ultra/SSAO lighting. 48-54 fps on open air in average, but stutters every 4 seconds.
https://yadi.sk/i/nPi1d1QvsLEWo

forum engine bugs a bit. doubling new lines.

Mildocjr

OK Just tested my 6GB 980Ti 1080p @144hz on hyper and I'm getting average 90 - 107 fps.

You can view the fps by using the console command: PerfOverlay.DrawFPS 1

Turning it off is: PerfOverlay.DrawFPS 0